Re: fvwm 2?

["Michael E. Deisher" <deisher@enws428.EAS.ASU.EDU>]

On Mon, 29 Jan 96 13:09 EST, rdm@tad.micro.umn.edu (Raul Miller) said:

> I anyone putting together a package for the current version of fvwm?

Personally, I hope we don't drop fvwm 1 when the fvwm 2 package comes
along.  Fvwm2 (2.0.40) is noticeably slower (on a 486dx2-66 w/ 16M
RAM) and uses significantly more memory.  I also found it to be less
stable than fvwm 1.  For example, moving the mouse too quickly caused
it to freeze for a few seconds.

--Mike