[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#2065: single user isn't



> > 
> > It is utterly unreasonable for the system to try and do fsck's when the
> > system is booted with 'linux single'.  The whole point of a single user boot
> > is that something is wrong that needs reasoned attention from a system
> > adminitrator.  A single-user boot should do absolutely *nothing* that isn't
> > required to drop the system admin into a shell.
> > 
> 
> This has been reported before as a bug.  This time I just thought i'd
> chime in and say "me too."
> 

I'll start to maintain the INIT package from the beginning of next year.
It took some time because I wanted to upgrade my system to ELF first.
In the new version there will be a flag that causes INIT to skip all
scripts and throw you in a shell directly. (sulogin will also be included).

Which brings up another question: in libc 5.2.18, struct utmp was changed.
At least I think it was 5.2.18, so 5.2.17 should be OK. To maintain
compatibility with a.out and programs compiled with libc < 5.2.18, I
think I'll downgrade 1 patchlevel. I hope HJ Lu sees this is a mistake and
backs it off in 5.2.20. Such a change should go into libc 5.3....

Does anybody know more about this?

-- 
  Miquel van    | Cistron Internet Services   --    Alphen aan den Rijn.
  Smoorenburg,  | mailto:info@cistron.nl          http://www.cistron.nl/
miquels@het.net | Tel: +31-172-419445 (Voice) 430979 (Fax) 442580 (Data)


Reply to: