Bug#1995: run-parts on laptops (fwd)
You (Raul Miller) wrote:
> Is there any point in establishing an init runlevel for "undocked"
> operation - that is, using a laptop away from AC power? Some
> laptops are capable of sensing when they go on and off of AC and
> could change the run level on their own. I can think of situations
> where you would want cron to run when AC was available.
> This sounds like a neat concept. Run-levels are rather limitted, but
> this seems to fit in with existing uses of the concept.
It would be trivial to add runlevels 7, 8 and 9 to init-
I'll do that in the next release (just change a few checks here and
Miquel van | Cistron Internet Services -- Alphen aan den Rijn.
Smoorenburg, | mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.cistron.nl/
email@example.com | Tel: +31-172-419445 (Voice) 430979 (Fax) 442580 (Data)