I haven't taken a look it this yet, but would we want to replace the
mathematical functions mentioned below with these new routines? I
caught this, and I believe that it points out a flaw (minor) in GCC,
and improvements to the math functions.
Ideas, comments, flames?
--D.J. Gregor, quiet Debian maintainer...
---------- Here's the message from comp.os.linux.announce -----------
From: John Bowman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 95 15:23:45 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Version 1.7 of inline-math has been uploaded to sunsite:
Inline-math is a set of gcc inlined floating-point math routines
that can typically improve execution speed by 10%. These routines
avoid using the flawed algorithms for sinh, tanh, asinh, and atanh
found in libm (which produce incorrect results for small arguments).
The new version intefaces better with GCC to avoid producing code that
can overflow the register stack in complex routines. Specifically, exp(),
expm1(), and atan2() were rewritten. Inlined versions of pow(), ceil(),
floor(), and the math extensions log2() and pow2() were also added.
John Bowman email@example.com
Institute for Fusion Studies, RLM 11.222
The University of Texas at Austin
Austin, TX 78712
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This article has been digitally signed by the moderator, using PGP.
Finger firstname.lastname@example.org for PGP key needed for validating signature.
Send submissions for comp.os.linux.announce to: email@example.com
PLEASE remember a short description of the software and the LOCATION.
------- end of forwarded message -------