Re: nvi 1.34-7 now available

[Ian Jackson <iwj10@cus.cam.ac.uk>]

Richard Kettlewell writes ("Re: nvi 1.34-7 now available"):
> Ian Murdock writes:
> >BTW, a suggestion wrt priority numbers--we should consider making the
> >lower numbers the highest priorities (i.e., the highest priority would
> >be 0; 10 would be a higher priority than 20; etc.).  By doing this, we
> >could centrally specify one specific package as the "default".  In the
> >case of vi, the centrally-specified default is nvi, which could have
> >priority 0.
> 
> If negative priorities are supported then this effect can be achieved
> using those, of course, though it might look rather odd ;-)

OK, 0.93.76 will support negative priorities.

Ian.