Re: two packages
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes ("two packages"):
> In both cases am I unable to deliver 'catch-all' full blown install
> scripts. That would be quite a huge job. Shall I package them as is with
> reasonable defaults?
Raul Miller writes ("Re: two packages"):
> Given the choice between no package and a difficult to use package, I
> think we've traditionally done the difficult to use package.
> But be prepared to receive bug-reports for the most henious problems.
As Raul says.