Re: non-dpkg packaging systems (was: Re: `pms' from BOGUS (Debian vs. BOGUS) )

To: Marc Ewing <marc@redhat.com>
Cc: mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (Bill Mitchell), debian-devel@Pixar.com, ke@pertron.central.de, bruce@Pixar.com
Subject: Re: non-dpkg packaging systems (was: Re: `pms' from BOGUS (Debian vs. BOGUS) )
From: Bruce Perens <bruce@Pixar.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 1995 13:44:00 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] m0sq4qh-000FEmC@mongo.pixar.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 05 Sep 1995 16:13:11 PDT." <[🔎] 199509052013.QAA01829@redhat.com>

It sounds like using something like RPM to build our packages might be a good
idea. I think the Debian binary package format is ahead of what Redhat is 
using,
and you should consider adopting it. Perhaps we can arrive at a merge of the
two.

	Thanks

	Bruce Perens

--
-- Attention Ham Radio Operators: For information on "Linux for Hams", read
-- the World Wide Web page http://www.hams.com/LinuxForHams, or e-mail to
-- info@hams.com .

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: non-dpkg packaging systems (was: Re: `pms' from BOGUS (Debian vs.
  - From: Marc Ewing <marc@redhat.com>

References:
- Re: non-dpkg packaging systems (was: Re: `pms' from BOGUS (Debian vs. BOGUS) )
  - From: Marc Ewing <marc@redhat.com>

Prev by Date: Re: non-dpkg packaging systems (was: Re: `pms' from BOGUS (Debian vs. BOGUS) )
Next by Date: Re: non-dpkg packaging systems (was: Re: `pms' from BOGUS (Debian vs.
Previous by thread: Re: non-dpkg packaging systems (was: Re: `pms' from BOGUS (Debian vs. BOGUS) )
Next by thread: Re: non-dpkg packaging systems (was: Re: `pms' from BOGUS (Debian vs.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread