Well, it appears there is a serious problem with libc 4.6.27 and
earlier. Should we upgrade to libc 4.7.4 at this late date? Has
anyone used this version? If so, what have been your experiences?
------- Start of forwarded message -------
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 13:34:54 -0400
From: Jeff Uphoff <email@example.com>
To: firstname.lastname@example.org (A.Cox)
Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,
Subject: Re: Final analysis of syslog threat under Linux
"AC" == A Cox <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
AC> This problem affects most Linux (and probably most unix systems)
AC> and should be acted on immediately. Simply switching to libc4.7.2
AC> will adequately protect almost all users. Note that libc4.7.2 has
AC> some bugs but libc4.7.4 appears more correct. Even though the built
AC> libc4.7.4 is in hjl's private area it should be made available by
AC> all ftp sites ASAP.
I have made a copy of libc-4.7.4 publicly available, for now, in:
This version is, as Alan states, not currently a public release; it's
only available in H.J. Lu's "hidden" GCC development area on
tsx-11.mit.edu (and its mirrors, of which linux.nrao.edu is one).
H.J. has given his OK for this "pseudo-release."
Jeff Uphoff - systems/network admin. | email@example.com
National Radio Astronomy Observatory | firstname.lastname@example.org
Charlottesville, VA, USA | http://linux.nrao.edu/~juphoff/
------- End of forwarded message -------