[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded bastille 1.3.0-5 (sparc) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 11:27:29 +0200
Source: bastille
Binary: bastille
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1:1.3.0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon <buildd@sparc.debian.org>
Changed-By: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <jfs@computer.org>
Description: 
 bastille   - Security hardening tool
Changes: 
 bastille (1:1.3.0-5) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Changed the init.d script to *not* run if there is no
   /etc/Bastille/bastille-firewall.cfg this should work when the
   user has answered questions in InteractiveBastille and created
   the cfg file.
 .
   * Added a pre-configuration of the firewall just as
   bastille-firewall-install does. Instead of changing
   Bastille/Firewall.pm to add Debian to the configuration (line 338)
   this is IMHO a better approach since changes in the init.d script
   or the software does not require re-installation of the firewall.
 .
   * This closes bug #147643 for sid, bug woody configuration does
   give the user a sense of "false security" since they configure the
   firewall but it's not enabled either after installation or on
   reboot.
 .
   * Added some missing dirs to debian/dirs
 .
   * Added /etc files to conffiles (Note: the bastille-firewall.cfg
   is not since is not provided yet in the package, it is generated
   through the Bastille programs)
Files: 
 c45618380594148c13106c8a21a68276 258042 admin optional bastille_1.3.0-5_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAjzrka8ACgkQgD/uEicUG7AHAACgmtJA+73FJRPbcixsu9OJYEpi
ryEAoL7+8lipfXRnf/aLHsu0dQeEUT2Q
=UXgR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-sparc-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: