[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded postfix 1.1.7-1 (sparc) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  7 Apr 2002 15:47:54 -0600
Source: postfix
Binary: postfix-mysql postfix-ldap postfix postfix-pcre postfix-dev postfix-doc
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.1.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon <buildd@sparc.debian.org>
Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lamont@debian.org>
Description: 
 postfix    - A high-performance mail transport agent
 postfix-ldap - LDAP map support for Postfix
 postfix-mysql - MYSQL map support for Postfix
 postfix-pcre - PCRE map support for Postfix
Closes: 123745 139756 140163 141129
Changes: 
 postfix (1.1.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream patch-release.  Various minor bug fixes.
   * Cause a 'no' answer to append_dot_mydomain to re-prompt for destinations,
     since localhost needs to be added.  Closes: #141129, #123745.
   * Do a restart instead of start for dpkg-reconfigure.  Closes: #140163
   * Add support for ldap_version and ldap_chase_referrals, patch from
     Sami Haahtinen <ressu@debian.org>.  Closes: #139756
   * Deliver upstream changelog in postfix package (as well as postfix-doc)
Files: 
 fad7a1396b28a5f613bbb79d5c88aa40 535748 mail extra postfix_1.1.7-1_sparc.deb
 cbe71ffbf199f32cd9f427cc9286047a 26894 mail extra postfix-ldap_1.1.7-1_sparc.deb
 9c54ca5012ec1b9dee2ff74585aedbe9 22994 mail extra postfix-pcre_1.1.7-1_sparc.deb
 98ced63795e02480429947935b1b73b2 24206 mail extra postfix-mysql_1.1.7-1_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAjyyvGMACgkQgD/uEicUG7AZXACgoSGCuco/N0oumo30dOLM+9sF
vvUAmwabIKILIesWTNn1+J58dOsOi7Xo
=V/hk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-sparc-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: