[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded gtk+2.0 2.0.2-2 (sparc) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  6 Apr 2002 04:26:14 +0900
Source: gtk+2.0
Binary: gtk2.0-examples libgtk2.0-dbg libgtk-common libgtk2.0-dev libgtk2.0-doc libgtk2.0-common libgtk2.0-0
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.0.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon <buildd@sparc.debian.org>
Changed-By: Akira TAGOH <tagoh@debian.org>
Description: 
 gtk2.0-examples - Examples files for the GTK+ 2.0
 libgtk-common - Dummy package for upgrading libgtkx.x-common
 libgtk2.0-0 - The GTK+ graphical user interface library
 libgtk2.0-common - Common files for the GTK+ graphical uesr interface library
 libgtk2.0-dbg - The GTK+ libraries and debugging symbols
 libgtk2.0-dev - Development files for the GTK+ library.
Closes: 141069
Changes: 
 gtk+2.0 (2.0.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/libgtk2.0-doc.doc-base.{gtk-faq,gtk-tutorial}:
     Grr, fix again... (closes: Bug#141069)
   * debian/scripts/vars.build: fix bashism.
Files: 
 96dd9f11a3bde44717565f03364aa300 1433958 libs optional libgtk2.0-0_2.0.2-2_sparc.deb
 bc6a34a94f98386289a607a2ef137b07 1098 misc optional libgtk-common_2.0.2-2_sparc.deb
 e12198159721d3f353724a35e98d6d3c 595306 misc optional libgtk2.0-common_2.0.2-2_sparc.deb
 c233f14698baf9b53dbed1083b14255d 177186 devel optional libgtk2.0-dev_2.0.2-2_sparc.deb
 3f1132f55a5897394c351ac3db6f03ac 2872348 devel extra libgtk2.0-dbg_2.0.2-2_sparc.deb
 b793d34b74c8fd167f892663f7540978 215166 x11 extra gtk2.0-examples_2.0.2-2_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8r5YON2Dbz/1mRasRAkCaAJ9aMKk44MxLRI5/a6HOZTHAtBYo8gCgxtww
v9vRKLFk7moDtvN363t+9/A=
=njQA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-sparc-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: