[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded python-xml 0.7-1 (sparc) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 22:21:29 +0100
Source: python-xml
Binary: xbel-utils python2.2-xml python-xml python2.1-xml xbel
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon <buildd@sparc.debian.org>
Changed-By: Jerome Marant <jerome@debian.org>
Description: 
 python2.1-xml - XML tools for Python (2.1.x)
 python2.2-xml - XML tools for Python (2.2.x)
Closes: 124209
Changes: 
 python-xml (0.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * We do not provide 4XPath and 4XSLT since they are still part of
     the current version of python-4suite. They will make their way into
     the package as soon as the new upstream release of python-4suite
     comes out.
   * debian/rules: added installation of xbel 1.1 DTD.
   * debian/xbel.sgml-catalog: added catalog entry for xbel 1.1.
   * debian/xbel.{postinst, prerm}: make use of `update-catalog' instead of
     `install-sgmlcatalog` which is the old catalog management tool.
     Closes: Bug#124209.
   * Removed debian/xbel.postrm since the catalog is now removed at
     prerm time.
   * debian/control:
     - modified xbel long description reflecting the existence of multiple
       DTDs for xbel.
     - made python-xml depend on python2.1-xml of version Source-Version.
   * debian/python{2.1, 2.2}-xml.README.debian: added a small paragraph
     explaining the reasons why we do not ship 4XPath and 4XSLT.
Files: 
 7c99882f7f439ae4ce435e71e0c851d8 567114 interpreters optional python2.1-xml_0.7-1_sparc.deb
 f099763d7ef82a8df0914e7df52edfd6 571584 interpreters optional python2.2-xml_0.7-1_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8MhHAN2Dbz/1mRasRAvCVAKC4BbD1HAXymuCY8M4mz1Fd74wnawCggXXz
K/4djpH6rmodmahiIu8KxZA=
=i9Fg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: