[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded postfix 0.0.20011210.SNAPSHOT-1 (sparc) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:18:57 -0700
Source: postfix
Binary: postfix-mysql postfix-ldap postfix postfix-pcre
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.0.20011210.SNAPSHOT-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon <buildd@sparc.debian.org>
Changed-By: LaMont Jones <lamont@debian.org>
Description: 
 postfix    - A high-performance mail transport agent
 postfix-ldap - LDAP map support for Postfix
 postfix-mysql - MYSQL map support for Postfix
 postfix-pcre - PCRE map support for Postfix
Closes: 122709
Changes: 
 postfix (0.0.20011210.SNAPSHOT-1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * New upstream version.
   * High urgency to get sendmail -bs fix into testing (0.0.20011125.SNAPSHOT-1
     should have been.)
   * Make lack of /etc/postfix/dynamicmaps.cf be a warning, instead of
     an obscure failure (SIGBUS).
   * Include LDAP patch from Will Day willday@rom.oit.gatech.edu (deal with
     timeouts from LDAP server by reconnecting, instead of saying '451',
     other cleanup.)
   * Upstream version of ia64 alignment fix added.
   * main.cf.dist is not gziped.  Closes: #122709.
   * add diversion of smtpd package's smtpd.8 (to smtpd.real.8).
Files: 
 94f41554f78ed02289a564ddcdd180fb 757128 mail extra postfix_0.0.20011210.SNAPSHOT-1_sparc.deb
 c18d479a4fe082a0530ef48ad8dc800e 27210 mail extra postfix-ldap_0.0.20011210.SNAPSHOT-1_sparc.deb
 3c951f5aff9ef2c5c647a2a617107696 24196 mail extra postfix-pcre_0.0.20011210.SNAPSHOT-1_sparc.deb
 f82ce9940d879c23b8af0a79a38f173b 25322 mail extra postfix-mysql_0.0.20011210.SNAPSHOT-1_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAjwY/eIACgkQgD/uEicUG7By3QCbBxelTfo8xXC++R3i4Jfm3uFO
y9cAnRfA9HezmuuSjQzy6aTWJU060a+p
=vtzh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: