[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded imagemagick 5.4.0.3-1 (sparc) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  7 Nov 2001 17:05:05 +0900
Source: imagemagick
Binary: libmagick++5 imagemagick libmagick5-dev libmagick5 perlmagick libmagick++5-dev
Architecture: sparc
Version: 4:5.4.0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon <buildd@sparc.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ryuichi Arafune <arafune@debian.org>
Description: 
 imagemagick - Image manipulation programs.
 libmagick++5 - The object-oriented C++ API to the ImageMagick library
 libmagick++5-dev - The object-oriented C++ API to the ImageMagick library.--developm
 libmagick5 - Image manipulation library (free version).
 libmagick5-dev - Image manipulation library (free version) -- development
 perlmagick - A perl interface to the libMagick graphics routines.
Closes: 88549 113309 117052
Changes: 
 imagemagick (4:5.4.0.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version. closes: #117052, #113309
   * The current imagemagick will use libhdf version5 (not 4).  However this
     feature is not stable, in fact the default is off.  closes: #88549
Files: 
 434c827e40c344053e642b97022c0e30 1479204 graphics optional imagemagick_5.4.0.3-1_sparc.deb
 d3e51bba0f0ae24a99a328ed68269cb9 1609450 libs optional libmagick5_5.4.0.3-1_sparc.deb
 e83030d0368f471dc6c2108b0754d0c8 63904 devel optional libmagick5-dev_5.4.0.3-1_sparc.deb
 342fda38312c74eb36e4f28ee3eca86d 117948 libs optional libmagick++5_5.4.0.3-1_sparc.deb
 dbdee6aea1a50efbe381952966b74d50 51388 devel optional libmagick++5-dev_5.4.0.3-1_sparc.deb
 20fbe89ed77b1fa220a2a937bf41360b 109518 interpreters optional perlmagick_5.4.0.3-1_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAjvr88oACgkQgD/uEicUG7DIMACg8Lycr9wHo0TWdmRS5c8Mgwk/
pjgAoN2tw9/Oa4kecnYqCzM9oF8seFOA
=2lGr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: