Uploaded pexts 0.0.20011016-1.1 (sparc) to ftp-master
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:25:21 -0500
Source: pexts
Binary: pexts-bzip2 pexts-admintools pexts-openldap pexts-curses pexts-mhash pexts-pcre pexts-newt
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.0.20011016-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon <buildd@sparc.debian.org>
Changed-By: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
Description:
pexts-admintools - Pike AdminTools module
pexts-bzip2 - Pike bzip2 module
pexts-curses - Pike (N)Curses module
pexts-mhash - Pike Mhash module
pexts-newt - Pike Newt module
pexts-openldap - Pike OpenLDAP module
pexts-pcre - Pike PCRE module
Closes: 116392
Changes:
pexts (0.0.20011016-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* NMU to fix build-failure
* debian/control:
- Build-Depend on autoconf (Closes: #116392)
- bumped Standards-Version (lintian-clean)
* debian/copyright: correct path to GPL
* debian/rules: comment out the call to dh_testversion in binary-arch rule
as it already was in binary-indep
Files:
edf6e0860fc4ebe4869f68e54f162dca 19670 interpreters optional pexts-admintools_0.0.20011016-1.1_sparc.deb
ca84d0ad4bc62ec61bd70cb89542dc5a 19982 interpreters optional pexts-curses_0.0.20011016-1.1_sparc.deb
4aee3ded5dcc3e07ee93284ad8141698 11084 interpreters optional pexts-mhash_0.0.20011016-1.1_sparc.deb
823c86bb9b2f219b4c427d9b6988d2af 31800 interpreters optional pexts-newt_0.0.20011016-1.1_sparc.deb
903ed02dc25203812049ec7d1a837fe9 24104 interpreters optional pexts-pcre_0.0.20011016-1.1_sparc.deb
b05a9e3bef8a59a9c0e50f67b26e3269 9834 interpreters optional pexts-bzip2_0.0.20011016-1.1_sparc.deb
8e081d256581385f06756698b17f280f 16806 interpreters optional pexts-openldap_0.0.20011016-1.1_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iEYEARECAAYFAjvr8+UACgkQgD/uEicUG7AhowCgu7J0rcAknCMqv62gK/GcYYHy
qRsAoJJp2BDfqC39cWRs3pU7yGxYJ1DE
=X5I9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: