Uploaded samba 2.2.1a-9 (sparc) to ftp-master
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 23:10:41 -0400
Source: samba
Binary: smbfs swat libpam-smbpass smbclient samba-common samba-doc samba
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.2.1a-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon <buildd@sparc.debian.org>
Changed-By: Eloy A. Paris <peloy@debian.org>
Description:
libpam-smbpass - pluggable authentication module for SMB password database
samba - A LanManager like file and printer server for Unix.
samba-common - Samba common files used by both the server and the client.
smbclient - A LanManager like simple client for Unix.
smbfs - mount and umount commands for the smbfs (for kernels >= than 2.2.
swat - Samba Web Administration Tool
Closes: 53672 110963 111036
Changes:
samba (2.2.1a-9) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Replaced $(LD) with $(CC) all the way through source/Makefile.
Closes: #111036: ld shouldn't be used to link shlibs.
* s/\/bin\/mail/\/usr\/bin\/mail/ in smb.conf's man page (HTML and
sgml as well.)
Closes: #110963: smb.conf: mail should be /usr/bin/mail.
* Documented better smbclient's -W behavior. Patch from Steve
Langasek.
Closes: #53672: smbclient: -W flag is interpreted as domain, not
workgroup.
Files:
c646a83944ed9c1cc76688ed30314ad2 2406942 net optional samba_2.2.1a-9_sparc.deb
cbe4f40118efddce159b73c660a9650e 789320 net optional samba-common_2.2.1a-9_sparc.deb
ad841946a0038fe67f09ec2451c010d6 948852 net optional smbclient_2.2.1a-9_sparc.deb
9cac2bbf6d4aebf7fa402c60b7def33f 345878 net optional swat_2.2.1a-9_sparc.deb
246efcefe1da861a6d730e2edb6e4d15 610812 otherosfs optional smbfs_2.2.1a-9_sparc.deb
639d35f80997b44548e79ac2bb9843a0 213654 admin extra libpam-smbpass_2.2.1a-9_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>
iEYEARECAAYFAjuXTb0ACgkQgD/uEicUG7DHVgCgnafn/jI11nSo++QxB+mjOGHe
bSAAnRNIhgVqWRfFrVRxWW2GVoE+Y1EU
=eZA+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: