[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded ppp 2.4.1-3 (sparc) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu,  5 Jul 2001 00:04:54 +1200
Source: ppp
Binary: ppp ppp-udeb
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.4.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GNU/Linux SPARC/UltraSPARC Build Daemon <buildd@sparc.debian.org>
Changed-By: Michael Beattie <mjb@debian.org>
Description: 
 ppp        - Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) daemon.
 ppp-udeb   - Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) daemon. (udeb)
Closes: 98728 101372 101584 101587 101754 101830 102313 102636
Changes: 
 ppp (2.4.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Removed signal handling patch. causes breakage on many (almost all)
     configurations different to Daniel's (holdoff 0, persist). Bug reopened.
   * Added patch from Russell Coker to add option to specify ip-up script.
     (Closes: #101587)
   * Added patch (slightly modified) from Russell Coker that fixes compile
     time warning. Not overly worrying, but what the hell. (Closes: #101584)
   * Added patch from Russell Coker to make setipaddr() available for
     portslave (Closes: #101830)
   * Modified utils.c to correctly build a lockfile when using devfs.
     (Closes: #101372, #101754)
   * Added Spanish debconf Template. Thanks to Carlos Valdivia.
     (Closes: #102636)
   * Correctly check f->maxtermtransmits in fsm.c so that lcp-max-terminate
     is honoured. (Closes: #98728)
   * Added reference to maxfail option from persist description in manpage.
     (Closes: #102313)
Files: 
 cb760b25b4ddedbc3e0d7e10231f753e 269426 base standard ppp_2.4.1-3_sparc.deb
 45bcb73434d9a251d8f9c313b53f1ff4 98914 debian-installer standard ppp-udeb_2.4.1-3_sparc.udeb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>

iEYEARECAAYFAjtDrnQACgkQgD/uEicUG7D9IQCgxcvb+/qBFAyz/xFywUM0QdqY
QkgAoJNpadilfCTS0d9PMWJLj5nzdMVE
=ePHE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: