Uploaded pilot-link 0.9.5.0-1 (sparc) to ftp-master
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:49:51 -0400
Source: pilot-link
Binary: pilot-link-perl libpisock-dev libpisock4 pilot-link
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.9.5.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GNU/Linux SPARC/UltraSPARC Build Daemon <buildd@sparc.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ben Darnell <bgdarnel@debian.org>
Description:
libpisock-dev - static libraries for communicating with a Pilot PDA.
libpisock4 - Libraries for communicating with a Pilot PDA.
pilot-link - Tools to communicate with a 3COM Pilot PDA over a serial port.
pilot-link-perl - Perl tools to communicate with a 3COM Pilot PDA over a serial por
Closes: 53256 64377 66000 71476 80661 80730 84498 86622 92547 97549 98862 99067 99069 99070 99696
Changes:
pilot-link (0.9.5.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New official upstream release (upstream version number is 0.9.5,
this package uses 0.9.5.0 because the prerelease NMUs were
misnumbered)
* Not an NMU (closes:#71476,#84498,#86622,#80730,#53256,#64377,#66000)
* Fixed self-build-dependency (closes: #99696, #92547)
* Add version to dependency on libpisock (closes: #97549)
* Re-wrote configuration scripts to use debconf (and devfs when available)
(closes:#99067,#99070,#98862,#99069)
* Fixed perl version depend (closes: #80661)
* Incremented library package version number to libpisock4
Files:
08d46a3d01e04cbf62ec4185c44e06c3 51416 libs extra libpisock4_0.9.5.0-1_sparc.deb
e78911b0a9a3b7341ab2a47f4e87a321 101606 devel extra libpisock-dev_0.9.5.0-1_sparc.deb
07f28512f302ae5e17cd9ba5b24f7bfc 71342 devel extra pilot-link-perl_0.9.5.0-1_sparc.deb
2e0309b8f76ffd7d517853b30f23ba5f 227430 otherosfs extra pilot-link_0.9.5.0-1_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>
iEYEARECAAYFAjtDY+gACgkQgD/uEicUG7CAJACgln4NPoxq/cjsRsNS+3I3buAb
Kr0AnixstZAJoNDdsfWpfT4xZ2cEzbBc
=tTGF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: