Uploaded wmaker 0.70.0-2 (sparc) to ftp-master
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 22:15:40 +0100
Source: wmaker
Binary: libwraster2-dev libwmaker0-dev wmaker libwings-dev libwraster2
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.70.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon <buildd@sparc.debian.org>
Changed-By: Marcelo E. Magallon <mmagallo@debian.org>
Description:
libwings-dev - Window Maker's own widget set
libwmaker0-dev - Static libraries and headers for Window Maker applications.
libwraster2 - Shared libraries of Window Maker rasterizer.
libwraster2-dev - Static libraries and headers of Window Maker rasterizer.
wmaker - NeXTSTEP-like window manager for X
Closes: 114746 115177
Changes:
wmaker (0.70.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* debian/rules: add patch and unpatch targets
* debian/patches: contains patches that I don't want on my CVS tree for
whatever reason
* debian/patches/00_0.70.1.diff: pulled out of CVS, fixes a number of
bugs in wmaker.
* debian/rules: include -I/usr/X11R6/include in get-*-flags --cflags
* debian/rules: add /usr/X11R6/bin/wmaker -> /usr/bin/wmaker symlink to
accommodate people who hardcode paths. This will be removed in woody+1.
(closes: bug#114746)
* Patch from Les Schaffer to get the GNOME pager working again (closes:
bug#115177)
Files:
1c7c1f9fe9ffff910922c60c99cdfaca 2044708 x11 optional wmaker_0.70.0-2_sparc.deb
b1f1173ac87ff9a00b8576f0602a29f3 57808 devel optional libwmaker0-dev_0.70.0-2_sparc.deb
6f9dd603b5ad2e2997c146e740f821da 104602 devel optional libwraster2-dev_0.70.0-2_sparc.deb
733d26acadc77002f708a3463de96855 97110 libs optional libwraster2_0.70.0-2_sparc.deb
c9b1105f60712fd124ba9e345a9049ba 325832 devel optional libwings-dev_0.70.0-2_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iEYEARECAAYFAjwBkoIACgkQgD/uEicUG7CG/QCgwFbxPB4BvBPra1F/V2nOLY1A
VnIAoN8vNLQcPacM1sxhjnlESwKV8xYN
=Duh/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: