[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded octave2.1 2.1.35-1 (sparc) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  2 Nov 2001 18:53:02 -0600
Source: octave2.1
Binary: octave2.1-info octave2.1-htmldoc octave2.1 octave2.1-headers octave2.1-emacsen octave2.1-doc
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.1.35-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon <buildd@sparc.debian.org>
Changed-By: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Description: 
 octave2.1  - The GNU Octave language for numerical computations
 octave2.1-headers - Header files for the GNU Octave language
Closes: 117581 117929
Changes: 
 octave2.1 (2.1.35-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Upgraded to new Octave development release 2.1.35
   * This upstream release supports gcc versions 2.9.x and 3.0.x so
     we do not need the full patch by Jeff Licquia <jlicquia@progeny.com>
     but use parts of it (in deban/rules and debian/control) to select
     gcc/g++/g77 3.0 on the ia64 architecture. (Closes: #117929)
   * debian/rules: Added --with-fftw to use Fast Fourier Transf. libraries
   * debian/control: Added fftw-dev to Build-Depends
   * debian/rules: Install .el files into octave2.1-emacsen, not octave
   * debian/50octave.el: Apply small patch to correct loading
   * Thanks to Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org> for both the
     suggestion and the patch (Closes: #117581)
   * debian/otags.1: contributed simple manual page (lintian)
   * debian/octave2.1-emacsen.{postinst,prerm}: dpkg-alternatives for otags
Files: 
 a385a5a21470d87b45eddf67786b2657 2908362 math optional octave2.1_2.1.35-1_sparc.deb
 c2a1658a3e7dac643a09c9a6d006e7a3 151062 math optional octave2.1-headers_2.1.35-1_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6a (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAjvlYcEACgkQgD/uEicUG7B+fACgqtsprt+L6FRFIWrGnWrECmvk
tCUAn2q6WDUi8iNObI5iUkEhiAv2CskB
=f8fw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: