[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded pike7 7.0.355-2 (sparc) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 18:15:46 +0200
Source: pike7
Binary: pike7-gtk pike7-gdbm pike7-mysql pike7-gz pike7-image pike7 pike7-lobotomized-crypto pike7-gl
Architecture: sparc
Version: 7.0.355-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon <buildd@sparc.debian.org>
Changed-By: Marek Habersack <grendel@debian.org>
Description: 
 pike7      - Powerful interpreted programming language
 pike7-gdbm - Gdbm module for Pike
 pike7-gl   - Mesa module for Pike
 pike7-gtk  - GTK module for Pike
 pike7-gz   - Gz module for Pike
 pike7-image - Image module for Pike
 pike7-lobotomized-crypto - Lobotomized crypto module for Pike
 pike7-mysql - Mysql module for Pike
Changes: 
 pike7 (7.0.355-2) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Added smartlink.c and smartlink.sh from Pike 7.2 - gets rid of
     rpath
Files: 
 0e9602d4285e8ee4912261bf8ce5b43c 1351432 interpreters optional pike7_7.0.355-2_sparc.deb
 90d32e0081f3a3dbe0acfd93a3e202cf 38566 interpreters optional pike7-mysql_7.0.355-2_sparc.deb
 7a4e5dadbeae214907e133581fc9908b 376764 interpreters optional pike7-image_7.0.355-2_sparc.deb
 c8b01f3859a66619d2180591aedb215e 31608 interpreters optional pike7-gdbm_7.0.355-2_sparc.deb
 2afa6fda98c79498bf2a5563e9299f5e 31622 interpreters optional pike7-gz_7.0.355-2_sparc.deb
 9a4f7ecaa224942e8ddb16f8f2066d49 230502 interpreters optional pike7-gtk_7.0.355-2_sparc.deb
 08ab206d7b1b214ec430a374627c0284 77150 interpreters optional pike7-gl_7.0.355-2_sparc.deb
 09ed786b1196c540b9d2fb32ff91f7a5 53966 interpreters optional pike7-lobotomized-crypto_7.0.355-2_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>

iEYEARECAAYFAjvRyPIACgkQgD/uEicUG7CJSQCgpXWJvdNGD09r90s8jm0jetmT
+lYAn3sLa7tLKg+18b4YrteAWTQPbnr5
=Kvqb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: