[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded dhcp 2.0pl5-6.1 (sparc) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:08:50 -0400
Source: dhcp
Binary: dhcp-client-udeb dhcp dhcp-relay dhcp-client
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.0pl5-6.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon <buildd@sparc.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adam Di Carlo <aph@debian.org>
Description: 
 dhcp       - DHCP server for automatic IP address assignment
 dhcp-client - DHCP Client
 dhcp-client-udeb - DHCP Client for debian-installer (udeb)
 dhcp-relay - DHCP Relay
Closes: 57917 66432 75604 76401 98680
Changes: 
 dhcp (2.0pl5-6.1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * NMU to fix RC bugs; specifically the urgency is high for
     boot-floppies; currently, things are breaking for boot-floppies when
     the network was configured statically
   * remove /etc/init.d/dhcp-client, since we use /etc/network/interfaces
     now; hopefully that doesn't break too many people upgrading, but
     better to break some upgrades than to break all new installs, IMHO
     closes: #66432, #98680
   * not having the init script, but using ifupdown, fixes tons of other
     problems too, although one wonders whether perhaps we shouldn't remove
     the init script on upgrade as well
     closes: #76401, #57917, #75604
Files: 
 f66de0980c5da4fe03a15188b25af6a4 209924 net optional dhcp_2.0pl5-6.1_sparc.deb
 4a6a2417de436f1c4ad1645cc83f6f88 197184 net optional dhcp-client_2.0pl5-6.1_sparc.deb
 68cd9c0c199b1dc9c0c80622256bbce1 150400 net optional dhcp-relay_2.0pl5-6.1_sparc.deb
 935cb0614809578e12ed37528824b46e 48252 debian-installer optional dhcp-client-udeb_2.0pl5-6.1_sparc.udeb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>

iEYEARECAAYFAjutH58ACgkQgD/uEicUG7BrFgCaAgEchpD7iNsYvNLaU6W/hmGa
2h4AoL0Ueqgf57gg6n4jR+bFFmWoa1FQ
=9+x6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: