[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded imlib 1.9.11-2 (sparc) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 16:08:17 -0400
Source: imlib
Binary: gdk-imlib1 imlib-progs gdk-imlib-dev imlib-dev imlib1 imlib-base
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.9.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon <buildd@sparc.debian.org>
Changed-By: Steve M. Robbins <smr@debian.org>
Description: 
 gdk-imlib-dev - Header files needed for Gdk-Imlib development
 gdk-imlib1 - Gdk-Imlib is an imaging library for use with gtk
 imlib-dev  - Header files needed for Imlib development
 imlib-progs - Configuration program for Imlib and GDK-Imlib
 imlib1     - Imlib is an imaging library for X and X11
Closes: 108723 109147
Changes: 
 imlib (1.9.11-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Do not unconditionally copy config.guess and config.sub during build.
     No longer depends on autotools-dev.
   * Fix configure.in to use "libtool" script in source directory.  (Closes: 109147)
   * Improve diagnostic message if image conversion fails.  (Closes: 108723)
   * Suggest imagemagick for imlib1.
   * Remove suggestions of netpbm and libjpeg-progs from gdk-imlib1; the
     code to use these as fallbacks is disabled at the moment.
Files: 
 bb52c7b5e3a184abe338de896a9c2b4c 252898 graphics optional imlib-progs_1.9.11-2_sparc.deb
 0df0eac9df32cb27916fd2d4d2ba8a07 77428 libs optional imlib1_1.9.11-2_sparc.deb
 4461df5615bb6c4875cbf63f62638091 84914 devel optional imlib-dev_1.9.11-2_sparc.deb
 af2b3e496153c03d68f42367672a2199 64094 libs optional gdk-imlib1_1.9.11-2_sparc.deb
 5ac1b83ac65dd9614f611e23af908959 74478 devel optional gdk-imlib-dev_1.9.11-2_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>

iEYEARECAAYFAjuA0V4ACgkQgD/uEicUG7BBDACdEoKFeU701ONBGpTuBAkARvfh
yJYAnibHIiopHatMCaFpHxjgfq+2RIVt
=Q1kF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: