[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded ircii-pana 1.0-0c18-1 (sparc) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 01:59:19 -0700
Source: ircii-pana
Binary: bitchx bitchx-gtk
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1:1.0-0c18-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon <buildd@sparc.debian.org>
Changed-By: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
Description: 
 bitchx     - Advanced Internet Relay Chat client
 bitchx-gtk - GTK interface for BitchX
Closes: 80009 81882 83646 85010 95051 98775
Changes: 
 ircii-pana (1:1.0-0c18-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Long overdue upgrade to 1.0c18 (Closes: #85010).
   * Don't run autoconf at build, since upstream now uses autoconf 2.49.
   * Remove db2 build dependency (what was it there for?).
   * Fix error in my server windows code again (Closes: #95051).
   * Handle dancer-hybrid server notices from remote servers.
   * Handle non-alphabetic umodes.
   * Bump MY_BUFFER up to 160, so that we can display the ungodly fifty-
     character oper mode strings that dancer-hybrid is so fond of.
   * Verify our user mode after connecting.
   * Add menu hints (Closes: #80009, #98775).
   * Don't allow -d (dumb mode) - it has not worked and is unlikely
     to be fixed (Closes: #83646).
   * Suggest x-terminal-emulator, and call it if xterm is not available
     (Closes: #81882).
   * Stop sedding debian/control, and use ${Source-Version} instead.
   * Add debhelper build dependency, oops.
   * Build DSO plugins with -fPIC.
Files: 
 469aee0b0d8e299ce6edbc46b502596c 1593178 net optional bitchx_1.0-0c18-1_sparc.deb
 1fd8c9df1cbb29d5f0c998bb1a7928cb 499636 net optional bitchx-gtk_1.0-0c18-1_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>

iEYEARECAAYFAjtladAACgkQgD/uEicUG7BG1QCg8DH1/zZfWeAohOgjElepZfJL
09sAmwUC7yoTEcLl3CflUVu40TBUXYfr
=1DM+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: