Uploaded flac 1.0-1 (sparc) to ftp-master
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 15:57:29 -0400
Source: flac
Binary: flac libflac-dev libflac1 xmms-flac
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon <buildd@sparc.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
Description:
flac - Free Lossless Audio Codec - command line tools
libflac-dev - Free Lossless Audio Codec - development library
libflac1 - Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtime library
xmms-flac - Free Lossless Audio Codec - XMMS input plugin
Changes:
flac (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream version.
* debian/control: Upstream now ships our man page, so there's no need to
build-depend on docbook-to-man. Build-dependency removed.
* debian/rules: Let upstream makefiles install headers and man page
* debian/control: Upstream library soname version has changed, modified
accordingly
* debian/rules: shlibs hackery is apparently no longer necessary, as
dpkg-shlibdeps will find shlibs files in package/DEBIAN
* Build-Depend on nasm on i386 to take advantage of optimized assembly
routines
* debian/rules, debian/control: Move the .la libtool widget from the
runtime package to the development package, and add Replaces
* ltmain.sh: Hack up to get things to work with libtool 1.4
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0105/msg02160.html>
* debian/rules: DH_COMPAT=3
Files:
24d26b19c743fed8c990dae19aa3e13e 97956 sound optional flac_1.0-1_sparc.deb
76ede519bbf18ebb1f468b91f232b4ba 62724 libs optional libflac1_1.0-1_sparc.deb
84b088bb1509069e7f1dc91b5205c478 74488 devel optional libflac-dev_1.0-1_sparc.deb
2eec701f428c49063c94b89105b11384 10476 sound optional xmms-flac_1.0-1_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>
iEYEARECAAYFAjtlahEACgkQgD/uEicUG7BJSACgwHMepC+QTzsLAnBXrSrljvG3
0gUAn0VgL1LhoUp6MCudjFEnM+LkS0ql
=hteQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: