Uploaded cracklib2 2.7-8.2 (sparc) to ftp-master
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 17:46:51 +0100
Source: cracklib2
Binary: cracklib2 cracklib2-dev cracklib-runtime
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.7-8.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon <buildd@vore.debian.org>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
Description:
cracklib-runtime - A pro-active password checker library
cracklib2 - A pro-active password checker library
cracklib2-dev - a pro-active password checker library
Closes: 70239 72244 75376 87355 91135 91136 91407 91414 91429
Changes:
cracklib2 (2.7-8.2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* debian/dpkg.common/modifysrc: Support build environments where the
.orig.tar.gz is not present in the parent directory (thanks, Mikko
Markus Torni; closes: #87355).
* debhelper namespacing was fixed in previous NMU, but fixed it more
neatly while I'm here (closes: #75376).
* Move to FHS locations for documentation (thanks, Jonathon M. Abbott;
closes: #91135, #91136, #91407, #91414, #91429).
* Don't link with -nodefaultlibs, as it has bad effects on some platforms
(closes: #72244).
* Add Section: and Priority: to the .deb's control file (lintian).
* Bump Standards-Version: to 3.1.1 and add build-dependency on debhelper
(>= 2.0.89) (closes: #70239).
* Fixed debian/dpkg.common/{check,substfiles}: both of them grepped the
output of dpkg-parsechangelog for "Version: " instead of "^Version: ",
which broke with the above changelog entry.
Files:
8075ae8442536645c8c4bf672ba27092 26342 libs optional cracklib2_2.7-8.2_sparc.deb
31d91c333e339d6ddfdbd6e0ad0f13eb 25002 devel optional cracklib2-dev_2.7-8.2_sparc.deb
01d92542ec93202b3e605b566e59bd6a 25336 admin optional cracklib-runtime_2.7-8.2_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
iD8DBQE7Awy7fNc/ZB4E7C0RAtTgAKC9Y+gn7U5ist0KPpkvDiI1PfNE3ACgqqx5
Cyd9lv++/luZHIULB9LOHtI=
=jLxi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: