Uploaded samba 2.2.0.final-2 (sparc) to ftp-master
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 17:27:18 -0400
Source: samba
Binary: smbfs swat smbclient samba-common samba-doc samba
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.2.0.final-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon <buildd@vore.debian.org>
Changed-By: Eloy A. Paris <peloy@debian.org>
Description:
samba - A LanManager like file and printer server for Unix.
samba-common - Samba common files used by both the server and the client.
smbclient - A LanManager like simple client for Unix.
smbfs - mount and umount commands for the smbfs (for kernels >= than 2.2.
swat - Samba Web Administration Tool
Closes: 85801 86063 88007 94480
Changes:
samba (2.2.0.final-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Work in progress - not uploaded yet.
* Added libcupsys2-dev to Build-Depends.
* Samba depends now (again) on netbase so update-inetd is always
available for the Samba maintainer scripts.
Closes: #86063: Fails to uninstall if inetd is not installed.
* Updated source/config.{sub,guess} so ARM built doesn't fail.
Closes: #94480: config.sub out of date; can't build on arm.
Closes: #85801: config.sub/guess out of date.
* Not using brace expansion, i.e. {foo,bar} in any of the maintainers
scripts nor in debian/rules.
Closes: #88007: samba postrm has is not POSIX sh compliant.
Files:
2706fc11c764851504eeb1314129df56 2149642 net optional samba_2.2.0.final-2_sparc.deb
2a069e647a7f2d692540f9320cb1c3dc 765274 net optional samba-common_2.2.0.final-2_sparc.deb
9298e07e36d3a68d60bc7316fe7ebecc 907922 net optional smbclient_2.2.0.final-2_sparc.deb
aa75e2713fae5a6e6c562608e068026f 326370 net optional swat_2.2.0.final-2_sparc.deb
50ad7a2d9930fa3a5cbeeba838ada392 587250 otherosfs optional smbfs_2.2.0.final-2_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
iD8DBQE642KJfNc/ZB4E7C0RAp9sAKC2WVJi5GEbtmodzhK0OPktVJzCbACfayF7
VUnRhydNl5FNDykD4k4llJA=
=Zdbw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: