[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded util-linux 2.11b-3 (sparc) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 19:41:14 +0200
Source: util-linux
Binary: bsdutils util-linux mount util-linux-locales
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.11b-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon <buildd@vore.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Description: 
 bsdutils   - Basic utilities from 4.4BSD-Lite.
 mount      - Tools for mounting and manipulating filesystems.
 util-linux - Miscellaneous system utilities.
 util-linux-locales - Locales files for util-linux
Closes: 36939 44749 55435 61425 61488 68804
Changes: 
 util-linux (2.11b-3) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Fixed the bug in umount that did let a user umount a file system
     mounted by root when the "user" option is set in /etc/fstab.
     (closes: #44749)
   * Corrected a build error on powerpc in debian/rules.
   * Corrected in util-linux-locales:
     Section : base -> utils
     Priority: required -> optional
   * Added the crypto patch again. (closes: #36939)
     Fixed in the new crypto patch:
     - It's now the complete crypto patch. (closes: #55435)
     - "losetup" no longer lists the available ciphers.
       (closes: #61425)
     - It already includes the patch from #68804. (closes: #68804)
   * Added blockdev to util-linux. (closes: #61488)
Files: 
 8373a4b3ace5c64ce3067b7264a3c21e 565364 utils optional util-linux-locales_2.11b-3_sparc.deb
 5684f829fddc3940f674c01fc0e29a90 256156 base required util-linux_2.11b-3_sparc.deb
 4b371cb548b7005199e77ade6a44b221 106126 base required mount_2.11b-3_sparc.deb
 ee02e6a4dd935e99832492cede1e43c6 37394 base required bsdutils_2.11b-3_sparc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>

iD8DBQE61nz5fNc/ZB4E7C0RAvfSAJ45CmG3PZK270ax4HsTY6pDwIsb0gCaAr4w
ySHoahl9o36ArUSJP548NIw=
=mkGX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: