Uploaded gtk+1.2 1.2.10-1 (sparc) to ftp-master
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 21:58:04 -0700
Source: gtk+1.2
Binary: libgtk1.2-dev libgtk1.2-doc libgtk1.2 libgtk1.2-dbg
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.2.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon <buildd@vore.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org>
Description:
libgtk1.2 - The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets for X
libgtk1.2-dbg - Debugging files for the GIMP Toolkit
libgtk1.2-dev - Development files for the GIMP Toolkit
Closes: 33952 34007 74796 77263 89082 89125 89125 89129 89129 89379 89806 90776
Changes:
gtk+1.2 (1.2.10-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream version.
* This new version fixes all locale-related bugs recently
reported. Note that if you don't want high ASCII characters to
be silently munched with glibc 2.2, at least set LANG=en_US to
get it away from the default to C, which no longer allows high
ASCII characters. (Closes: #74796, #77263, #89379, #90776, #89125,
#89129, #89806)
* Build with --with-native-locale=yes. Should fix all locales-related
segfaults recently reported. (But if you want high ASCII chars
to appear when using libc 2.2, you should set LANG=en_US at least,
or it'll default to LANG=C and filter all high ASCII characters!)
(Closes: #89125, #89129)
* Add support in debian/rules for adding -g and not stripping if
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains "debug" or "nostrip", respectively.
(Closes: #33952, #34007)
* Remove dependancy on gconv-modules. (Closes: #89082)
Files:
dba280a3cb8135ad1fe27b972fb246ac 1018604 devel optional libgtk1.2-dev_1.2.10-1_sparc.deb
a25361a8db70710958e670828d4a70e1 660320 libs optional libgtk1.2_1.2.10-1_sparc.deb
a7487b35e8d01214fc39bfe78573024f 962354 devel optional libgtk1.2-dbg_1.2.10-1_sparc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
iD8DBQE6zF50fNc/ZB4E7C0RAo7xAJ0TMfHjn70My9JOfCVWDjIqadEzTQCfTqNf
WvgyhS7kpE0RvD8vWZvgkII=
=EC9K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: