[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded xfs-xtt 1.3.0.xf402-1 (sparc) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  5 Jan 2001 03:53:52 +0900
Source: xfs-xtt
Binary: xfs-xtt
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1:1.3.0.xf402-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon <buildd@vore.debian.org>
Changed-By: ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <ishikawa@linux.or.jp>
Description: 
 xfs-xtt    - X-TrueType font server
Changes: 
 xfs-xtt (1:1.3.0.xf402-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Happy New Century :-)
   * migrate to use doogie-build-system
   * based on Debian xfree86_4.0.2 package.
   * modified patches bellow:
      - 109_debian_config.diff (mail address change to me)
   * removed patches bellow:
      - 012_specs_fixups.diff (spec documents do not included in source of xfs-xtt)
      - 100_no_non-free_fonts.dif (fonts do not included in source xfs-xtt)
   * add these patches for xfs-xtt build bellow:
      - 800xfs-xtt_build_fix.diff
      - 802xfs-xtt_pid_remane.diff
      - 900_debian_xfs-xtt_host.def.diff
      - 901_debian_xfs_only_build.diff
      - 901_debian_xfs-xtt_config.diff
   * change default port to 7110 (7100 is used by xfs and 7101 is used by
     xfstt).
   * change to use /etc/X11/fs-xtt instead of /etc/X11/fs
   * change to not build libXfont-xtt shared library, so remove
     libxfont-xtt package
   * code conv modules are linked statically.
   * remove include files and imake config files from libxfont-xtt-dev
     package. These are included in xlibs-dev package.
   * libXfont-xtt.a merged into xfs-xtt package and removed
     libxfont-xtt-dev package.
   * fix pidfile name problem
Files: 
 6874d4ad60d35e0666ee164f26619c26 898202 x11 optional xfs-xtt_1.3.0.xf402-1_sparc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>

iD8DBQE6V/i3fNc/ZB4E7C0RAiPwAKCwjOt/p7XOp1dopRV7Dtw5KaSoawCgh6xB
/HjsiyhLKaOW3do+cw7d9xQ=
=KrDh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: