On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:25:29AM +0100, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: >[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=293346 JPEG 2000 es no-libre. <anibal> if a license limits you to not change the format of a file, is it dfsg compliant? <asuffield> doubt it <anibal> I'm reading http://bugs.debian.org/293346 <asuffield> jpeg 2000. I know how this is going to go <anibal> that's right <asuffield> yup, standard jpeg 2000 "forking is banned" license <asuffield> we've seen that one before <asuffield> utter joke it is <anibal> may I quote your comment? <asuffield> if you must, but the one you're looking for is the old jasper license <asuffield> I think that one actually got unfucked in the end <asuffield> few years ago on -legal <asuffield> the basic problem is that it precludes the possibility of there ever being a jpeg 2006 Aníbal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature