[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded tmpreaper 1.6.0 (m68k) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  5 Mar 2002 14:42:19 +0100
Source: tmpreaper
Binary: tmpreaper
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.6.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon <buildd@kullervo.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Changed-By: Paul Slootman <paul@debian.org>
Description: 
 tmpreaper  - Cleans up files in directories based on their age
Closes: 126143 128896
Changes: 
 tmpreaper (1.6.0) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added --ctime option to make tmpreaper also check the ctime in addition to
     the atime. This is useful where the directory is accessible as a Samba
     share, as DOS PCs (including all the incarnations of Windows) will
     preserve the original mtime _and_ atime when copying files on such a
     share. This meant that recently copied files could disappear the next
     night. This is IMHO significant enough for a minor number bump...
     closes:#126143
   * Added --ctime option to tmpreaper invocation in /etc/cron.daily/tmpreaper
   * Improved some of the comments in /etc/cron.daily/tmpreaper to more
     accurately reflect the /etc/tmpreaper.conf situation.
   * Changed way default settings are done in cron.daily script, so that an
     empty conf file won't cause the defaults to be skipped. Also part of
     bug 126143.
   * Added tmpreaper.conf manpage.
   * Added german translation to debconf templates. closes:#128896
Files: 
 78094bdaf2ca08cdd3e8f2ea41a1373d 20464 admin optional tmpreaper_1.6.0_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE9JKTacS3JWD3FdvcRArmtAJ46ypHL/AWK7c7WUjdt07TDm3kCQQCeLhVS
bm0V5Htznch+Ov9mHSQQC8Y=
=mZSW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-m68k-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: