[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded gtk-gnutella 0.90.0-1 (m68k) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 20:32:23 +0100
Source: gtk-gnutella
Binary: gtk-gnutella
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.90.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account <buildd@ax.westfalen.de>
Changed-By: Matthias Kabel <mkabel@debian.org>
Description: 
 gtk-gnutella - shares files in a peer to peer network
Changes: 
 gtk-gnutella (0.90.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version
    - All configuration can now be made from the GUI.
    - Fully redesigned search filters to work like ipchains/iptable on Linux.
    - Obsoleted experimental "auto-download", superseded by the new filtering
      code.
    - Added Gnutella bandwidth management.
    - Both HTTP and Gnet bandwidth is now displayed real time.
    - Added full HUGE support (Hash/URN Gnutella Extensions).
    - Added support for local host preference.
    - Gtk-gnutella can do traffic compression when connecting to a node that
      also supports it.
    - Upload and downloads will now show User-Agent/Server information.
    - Added status to the download queue.
    - You can now freeze the download queue whilst manipulating it.
    - Searches can now be listed on the left side of the screen, or as tabs like
      in the previous versions.
    - Added automatic banning of servents that are hammering us.
    - Many more cool new features that you'll discover whilst playing with it.
Files: 
 4cdc136912524adbe36e13df6db55820 252044 net optional gtk-gnutella_0.90.0-1_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6

iD8DBQE9G0KaWgZ1HEtaPf0RAg+vAJ9qEHr7oA29OgJoWlLrYFkPQk+5iACeM+a6
Orv8WCabUHiAW4ZvmbTawHE=
=MsXx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-m68k-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: