[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded sendmail 8.12.3-6 (m68k) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 11:00:00 -0500
Source: sendmail
Binary: sendmail libmilter-dev sendmail-doc
Architecture: m68k
Version: 8.12.3-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account <buildd@spice.cologne.de>
Changed-By: Richard A Nelson (Rick) <cowboy@debian.org>
Description: 
 libmilter-dev - The Sendmail Mail Filter API (Milter).
 sendmail   - A powerful, efficient, and scalable Mail Transport Agent.
Closes: 144230 144377
Changes: 
 sendmail (8.12.3-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Split Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep
   * Stop error messages from smmsp testing
   * Improve autoconf db support -- can now build 8.9.3 on woody !
   * dos2unix on cyrus21.m4
   * libmilter-dev no longer Depends: sendmail (to allow folks to support
     milters without having to actually install sendmail)
   * Add port 587 (MSP) to /etc/inetd.conf                  closes: #144230
     add smtps port at the same time (though I'm not sure it'll work)
   * TLS/SSL support is now *OFF* by default                closes: #144377
     update_tls will tell you how to enable it
   * Bump certificate validity to a full year... you can use
     '/usr/share/sendmail/update_tls new' to create new certificates!
   * mv /etc/mail/ssl to /etc/mail/tls for consistancy
Files: 
 32c59972034890c1def6a8e0155215c0 895234 mail extra sendmail_8.12.3-6_m68k.deb
 475bece6ba3a98d4fadba801258b0fc6 68726 devel extra libmilter-dev_8.12.3-6_m68k.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Rick Younie <younie@debian.org>

iEYEARECAAYFAjzKuFUACgkQEycGpQPNsdK0PQCaAr21rkdf869BwHxw5qvDbrUA
ohIAnRJIU29DGwOP4Zg+gCdMHvcQU44z
=bdxv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-m68k-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: