[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded e2fsprogs 1.26-3 (m68k) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 14:53:15 +0100
Source: e2fsprogs
Binary: e2fsck-static e2fsprogs-bf e2fslibs-dev comerr-dev ss-dev e2fsprogs uuid-dev
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.26-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k (bruno) buildd <buildd@bruno.fmepnet.org>
Changed-By: Yann Dirson <dirson@debian.org>
Description: 
 comerr-dev - The Common Error Description library - headers and static librari
 e2fsck-static - A statically-linked version of the ext2 filesystem checker.
 e2fslibs-dev - The headers and static libraries for ext2fs-aware tools-developme
 e2fsprogs  - The EXT2 file system utilities and libraries.
 e2fsprogs-bf - A stripped-down versions of e2fsprogs, for boot-floppies
 ss-dev     - Command-line interface parsing library - headers and static libra
 uuid-dev   - Universally unique id library - headers and static libraries.
Changes: 
 e2fsprogs (1.26-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Simple rebuild after fixing the settings of my computer's clock, so
     that katie accepts to install the package.
Files: 
 9848b29d61d0655208d34d31734e09f1 204132 admin optional e2fsck-static_1.26-3_m68k.deb
 a42b593e24ca43737df40f155586d78e 155706 devel extra e2fsprogs-bf_1.26-3_m68k.deb
 4cc2d8b5fdebbb0ac23ae9cdf2d8b707 312950 base required e2fsprogs_1.26-3_m68k.deb
 0fd2d7587172e6e02f3258c51ec3fcd2 106380 devel extra e2fslibs-dev_1.26-3_m68k.deb
 4b04a2da5a9f79806515fcc6fd492317 39162 devel extra comerr-dev_2.0-1.26-3_m68k.deb
 6a77d14584f32bb925cee004db778c48 13318 devel extra ss-dev_2.0-1.26-3_m68k.deb
 c22359de905c9c1f51bf9bb07023ce13 13334 devel extra uuid-dev_1.2-1.26-3_m68k.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Rick Younie <younie@debian.org>

iEYEARECAAYFAjx7pWAACgkQEycGpQPNsdJ03gCfZIH3vGmovXYUmYiOeVjkbkhX
ieMAn2xxGVqo5V3XPofSHYDw3FpfDldn
=KMEU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Reply to: