[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded mailutils 20020221-1 (m68k) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:40:48 -0500
Source: mailutils
Binary: libmailutils0-dev mailutils-pop3d mailutils-imap4d mailutils mailutils-doc libmailutils0
Architecture: m68k
Version: 20020221-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account <buildd@ax.westfalen.de>
Changed-By: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@nisa.net>
Description: 
 libmailutils0 - GNU Mail Abstraction library
 libmailutils0-dev - Development files for GNU mailutils
 mailutils  - GNU Mailutils mailx client
 mailutils-imap4d - Mailutils-based IMAP4 Daemon
 mailutils-pop3d - Mailutils-based POP3 Daemon
Closes: 116976 116977 119010 126095 126098 126755 134330 134332
Changes: 
 mailutils (20020221-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * GAH!  Has it been so long since I did my NM that I can't get the
   closes regexps right?  If your bug gets notified from this,
   it was fixed in Yesterday's update.
   Closes: #126755, #134332, #134330, #126095, #126098, #119010, #116976, #116977
   * New snapshot gives the ability to choose which PAM file you want
   from the command line.
   * Make sure that the info files are registered.  Thanks to Sam Roberts for
   bringing this to my attention.
   * Other random bug fixes.
Files: 
 a94931cd7aba81fbfa1f9e510e99d12b 104660 libs optional libmailutils0_20020221-1_m68k.deb
 f3c5773026bbcc4b5edefd8c1dbd3874 115588 devel optional libmailutils0-dev_20020221-1_m68k.deb
 04049223a8d9e0a467682ccb5a0c59f4 88588 mail optional mailutils_20020221-1_m68k.deb
 454e7252e1d17ce5e24bf0b748fffb6b 34892 net optional mailutils-imap4d_20020221-1_m68k.deb
 ac3aef2f2f718190a0cd3ca42de8e12d 24802 net optional mailutils-pop3d_20020221-1_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6

iD8DBQE8eCdNWgZ1HEtaPf0RAoGJAJ0dYqdtTD6duBfNn6MvX937VgagOQCffoov
Unohu//xOi7Z2ZT9GUcsFa8=
=0dbi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Reply to: