[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded blt 2.4u-7 (m68k) to erlangen

Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 10:18:48 +0000
Source: blt
Binary: blt8.0-dev blt-dev blt-common blt-demo blt
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.4u-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account <buildd@ax.westfalen.de>
Changed-By: Gordon Russell <gor@debian.org>
 blt        - Shared libraries for blt
 blt-common - Common run-time parts to the BLT libraries
 blt-demo   - blt demo scripts - a tcl/tk extension library
 blt-dev    - Development in blt - a tcl/tk extension library
 blt8.0-dev - Development in blt and tk8.0 - a tcl/tk extension library
Closes: 128413 131356 132761
 blt (2.4u-7) unstable; urgency=low
   * Problem reported in the shlibs file. I had created this file by hand due
     to problems which existed somewhere but are now long forgotten. I have
     changed the mechanism back to the dh_ approach.
     (closes: #131356)
   * For no strong reason I have removed the circular dependencies from the
     control file. You man now install blt-common on its own if you wish.
     (closes: #128413)
   * Added blt8.0 to the conflicts line of blt, even though blt provides
     blt8.0. I am sure I had this originally but this was against the policy.
     Hope it is ok this time.
     (closes: #132761)
   * Lintian fixes: fixed config/ldconfig issue, removed emacs settings from
     changelog file, removed duplicate relation in blt-dev control. Lintian
     still reports problems with shlibs file. I hope I have got it right this
 42756fd1297c88b829b047716b3b4853 1255954 libs extra blt_2.4u-7_m68k.deb
 24cc6f247a15d87f45909b8bd223f208 28232 libs extra blt-common_2.4u-7_m68k.deb
 eb5aabbe9ea219f383feeaebc89f73a6 886010 devel extra blt-dev_2.4u-7_m68k.deb
 1b90b8b8b4d38817eeec2061e9ebe69f 591498 devel extra blt-demo_2.4u-7_m68k.deb
 7178fd2eaae9cdaf2490e4d457dc91d6 884372 devel extra blt8.0-dev_2.4u-7_m68k.deb
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6


Reply to: