[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded sendmail 8.11.4+8.12.0.Beta12-4 (m68k) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:00:00 -0500
Source: sendmail
Binary: sendmail libmilter-dev sendmail-doc
Architecture: m68k
Version: 8.11.4+8.12.0.Beta12-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account <buildd@ax.westfalen.de>
Changed-By: Richard A Nelson (Rick) <cowboy@debian.org>
Description: 
 libmilter-dev - The Sendmail Mail Filter API (Milter).
 sendmail   - A powerful, efficient, and scalable Mail Transport Agent.
Closes: 105683
Changes: 
 sendmail (8.11.4+8.12.0.Beta12-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Update mailstats to better handle errors (thanks JPS)
     debian/local/sm_helper.sh
   * Update configure.in to allow building on slink/potato - db2 vs db
     debian/configure.in
   * Note in /etc/mail/sendmail.conf that DAEMON_MODE/QUEUE_MODE=none is
     not, for the nonce, supported - it is intended for nullclient setups,
     but I've not yet been able to get a decent & working setup ;-(
     debian/local/update_conf
   * Correct rules for TLS enabled debuild vs debian/rules binary
     debian/build/rules.in
   * Move much of the Autoconf input to a new build directory - now
     the debian directory is much cleaner
     debian/build/rules.in, debian/configure.in, debian/build/*
   * Update copyright text
     debian/copyright
   * Remove inetd.conf entry for sendmail upon purge (and disable on remove)
     thanks Wichert Akkerman   closes: #105683
Files: 
 54f10cbf602c4dac16c1e37475e9e636 1209990 mail extra sendmail_8.11.4+8.12.0.Beta12-4_m68k.deb
 fa718fabd83500fdbbc17af68c3a6b48 247156 devel extra libmilter-dev_8.11.4+8.12.0.Beta12-4_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Weitere Infos: siehe http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjtdLDgACgkQjH3TJU9qR445xACgkrKwa6oZMqKfM9q7OM31sGG8
/7gAn3N3c25YzPkBbM4Tper+tZpfHscV
=b9Jn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Reply to: