Uploaded pike7.2 7.2.107-1 (m68k) to erlangen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 12:58:38 +0200
Source: pike7.2
Binary: pike7.2-gdbm pike7.2-mysql pike7.2-gz pike7.2-image pike7.2 pike7.2-lobotomized-crypto pike7.2-gl pike7.2-gtk
Architecture: m68k
Version: 7.2.107-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account <buildd@ipmsun1.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Changed-By: Marek Habersack <grendel@debian.org>
Description:
pike7.2 - Powerful interpreted programming language
pike7.2-gdbm - Gdbm module for Pike
pike7.2-gl - Mesa module for Pike
pike7.2-gtk - GTK module for Pike
pike7.2-gz - Gz module for Pike
pike7.2-image - Image module for Pike
pike7.2-lobotomized-crypto - Lobotomized crypto module for Pike
pike7.2-mysql - Mysql module for Pike
Changes:
pike7.2 (7.2.107-1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Fixes the alignment of structures inside Pike which makes it
possible to build it correctly on the m68k architecture
Files:
479cd719fcc28c597a590512a19fe312 2238506 interpreters optional pike7.2_7.2.107-1_m68k.deb
a96fdc11937d881408acbc11f19d3998 31418 interpreters optional pike7.2-mysql_7.2.107-1_m68k.deb
ac344beb608fcd8c0491f727f86c0c02 307420 interpreters optional pike7.2-image_7.2.107-1_m68k.deb
86b96f618fedb68cc830824246252b64 25398 interpreters optional pike7.2-gdbm_7.2.107-1_m68k.deb
8b416e7dee2436c73f2d714ec53062c7 25442 interpreters optional pike7.2-gz_7.2.107-1_m68k.deb
acb9d9423b3ceb15352db93435a0f1c9 210112 interpreters optional pike7.2-gtk_7.2.107-1_m68k.deb
1360a475347a1b827926f8ec59a96211 85746 interpreters optional pike7.2-gl_7.2.107-1_m68k.deb
b9de76dd62ad60cada47cb0fc6fb2bbb 47724 interpreters optional pike7.2-lobotomized-crypto_7.2.107-1_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBO1QQ22547I3m3eHJAQExeAP+JkyvwQXKzs4fIFQ5rb39tQAHH7fzHni8
OMyhPhoCnnTvCDZcACjerDJJPc06mFCdHR0uTo/3Y+AvNmezozmt6BX/+aVGW7eX
aitMeWUDfZV/oEk8KqF0+teXeLauJzTcOSsNz4JEKoCiaI8f3brUNxDlEX+2I1Ay
m8oQdVNgBlw=
=ISoc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: