[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded opensp 1.5pre5-2 (m68k) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 16:07:33 -0400
Source: opensp
Binary: libosp-dev opensp libosp2
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.5pre5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon <buildd@q650.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Changed-By: Adam Di Carlo <aph@debian.org>
Description: 
 libosp-dev - OpenJade group's SP suite, developer support
 libosp2    - Runtime library for OpenJade group's SP suite
 opensp     - OpenJade group's SGML parsing tools
Closes: 101837 103791 104126
Changes: 
 opensp (1.5pre5-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * ship PO files in libosp package
   * some upstream changes from CVS, not yet released; this version will
     call itself 1.5pre6, however
   * nsgmls: apply a patch which should enable compilation on gcc 3.0
     closes: #103791
   * debian/rules: make maintainer-clean upstream is incredibly fragile,
     so tolerate errors there until that gets fixed
   * debian/rules: during build, run libtoolize --force to replace this
     libtoolize stuff, which is needed for arches which diverge from the
     libtool stuff OpenSP ships with
     closes: #101837, #104126
   * debian/rules, control: use dh_shlibdeps, remove some hand-rolled stuff
     here which was unnecessary and in fact adding two libosp deps on the
     opensp package, not to mention that it stopped working
Files: 
 4c2b9994cc84e82d14b15792d9650c28 197478 text optional opensp_1.5pre5-2_m68k.deb
 a556804db81b572a8d2f748082279e2d 856878 libs optional libosp2_1.5pre5-2_m68k.deb
 77384e15f78cb256c4e5ef747718ccf4 1418040 devel optional libosp-dev_1.5pre5-2_m68k.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBO1GkKG547I3m3eHJAQHJAAP7BjgTmkCLHfLEMTtZgJaPMBkenDPliPfx
1/ldtBw7VR/TQTFAejOuXGXOudA+9RdoZv1RcpcBgBr1+Gl7YvRBlyVn1rWmQzZk
mb9RX+3KeqjxsamtKw2cY9W3MuwbwC3Vt1nLX2QCYL8hx9R8feKW6KRZF2mGlQ/0
zqJoGrpIu2w=
=rENV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: