[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded nis 3.9-3 (m68k) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:32:30 +0200
Source: nis
Binary: nis
Architecture: m68k
Version: 3.9-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon <buildd@q650.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Changed-By: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>
Description: 
 nis        - Clients and daemons for the Network Information Services (NIS).
Closes: 28030 38591 58881 63171 69214 77090 90470 96066 97599 97693 97846 98886 99411 99966 100138
Changes: 
 nis (3.9-3) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Update docs about /etc/init.d/nis and /etc/default/nis (closes: #98886)
   * Updated nis.debian.howto
   * Fix the debconf stuff (closes: #99966, #97693)
   * Added german tranlations (closes: #100138)
   * Also include the preinst file in the package .. now /etc/default/nis
     actually works (closes: #63171, #77090)
   * Don't stop running NIS processes during upgrade, they tend to be
     essential for functioning of the system. Just restart NIS in the postinst.
   * Fix symbolic links (closes: #99411, #97846)
   * kill running ypbinds manually if upgrading from an older
     version of the NIS package (closes: #97599)
   * Put a comment about DNS in /etc/yp.conf (closes: #96066)
   * Don't export shadow entries < MINUID (closes: #69214, #90470, #28030)
   * Set MINUID to 1000 to comply with policy (closes: #38591, #58881)
   * Up timeout on connecting to ypxfrd from 25 microsecs to 2 secs.
     25 us is really way to short - ypxfr almost always failed connecting
     to ypxfrd.
Files: 
 d0f89ff9798456c321b8f0aa6596616f 159604 net extra nis_3.9-3_m68k.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBOzmkCm547I3m3eHJAQFePAP/Zu3ZUfGmjSbbr0Jvc1U/32g6O3lfwcjg
qf4JhiKumjZS7M539QuU7uT8svVe0jZYEVYQqX6PoHV7hxge11x9TFP1sslsxGYs
CDLyvczqP1ELmyKrW0c6wkpm5ndW7DbW6q38wiCk+g4Qg2OXP4fxFGz0rsOHW2Fk
gzQj5YiVutg=
=aJHu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: