Uploaded xcall 0.10 (m68k) to ftp-master
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 13:30:05 +0200
Source: xcall
Binary: xcall
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k buildd4 <buildd@slam.debian.net>
Changed-By: Joop Stakenborg <pa3aba@debian.org>
Description:
xcall - Packet radio program for X/GTK
Changes:
xcall (0.10) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Renamed preferences.[ch] to init.[ch] so it can be used for general
initializations.
* Removed EAX25 checkbox. We should set this through the proc filesystem.
* Renamed user_io.[ch] to packet.[ch]. Should contain packet related
functions for AX.25 netrom and rose.
* Add proc.c and proc.h for reading information from the proc filesystem.
* Fixed some header errors in packet.c.
* Wrote a function called portsinit which is called at program startup and
saves names of active ports for AX.25, NET/ROM and Rose in a GList.
* Make all colors in the main window configurable through color buttons on
the preferences->display page. Add a color selection dialog.
* Add checkboxes for disabling scrollbar and menu to the display page.
* AX.25 page now contains information read from /proc/sys/net/ax25/<port>
and a dropdown selection box for selecting a port.
* Add a general page to the preferences dialog where the download directory
and timeout for a connection setup can be filled in.
* Xcall now reads ~/.xcall/xcallrc with should be a gtkrc file. Sample file
included with SGI-like theme.
* Save settings at program exit instead of clicking OK in the preferences
dialog.
* Add checkboxes for saving window position and size to the preferences
dialog.
* Show a popup window if portsinit fails.
Files:
894903ea195327f58c4b131db131ba7d 32810 hamradio optional xcall_0.10_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Rick Younie <younie@debian.org>
iEYEARECAAYFAjsWT6AACgkQEycGpQPNsdKUkQCeMLp0t2nNv89+9xCL/R2uF8aK
BpwAoIibnc+FsAJnmaeRTFwMdGiABayv
=aRZv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: