[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded gnome-print 0.28-0.1 (all m68k) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  3 Apr 2001 00:14:58 -0700
Source: gnome-print
Binary: libgnomeprint-dev libgnomeprint-bin libgnomeprint-data libgnomeprint15
Architecture: all m68k
Version: 0.28-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account <buildd@ax.westfalen.de>
Changed-By: Ryan Murray <rmurray@debian.org>
Description: 
 libgnomeprint-bin - The GNOME Print architecture (binary files)
 libgnomeprint-data - The GNOME Print architecture (data files)
 libgnomeprint-dev - The GNOME Print architecture (development files)
 libgnomeprint15 - The GNOME Print architecture
Closes: 67001 76751 77768 77768 78360 78414 78993 79577 80462 80463 80739 83729 84432 88695 90385
Changes: 
 gnome-print (0.28-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * NMU.
   * New upstream version (closes: #77768, #88695, #77768)
   * Update build-depends (closes: #90385)
   * Add Conflicts/Replaces on gnome-print where needed (closes: #78414, #83729)
   * Fontmap is not part of the package for some time now (closes: #67001)
   * dpkg can install this just fine if you install the packages together
     (closes: #79577)
   * libgnomeprint6 doesn't exist anymore, and we conflict (closes: #76751)
     (closes: #78360, #78993, #80462, #80463, #80739)
   * Update libgnomeprint-dev depends (closes: #84432)
Files: 
 ec8fe9cb6c959d71c7ab76eb57cd537f 202414 admin optional libgnomeprint15_0.28-0.1_m68k.deb
 71fb1961df9d8c05151ef44cd187f966 222680 admin optional libgnomeprint-dev_0.28-0.1_m68k.deb
 6f5047f7595de214d7433c3483dce360 9226 admin optional libgnomeprint-bin_0.28-0.1_m68k.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBOuFixm547I3m3eHJAQF43AP+LLma5PYDwIsafiRCGaSzcoOhMxb2w1vN
vlLfs1utZ7bbrkMCHpCrzZfvw8uzMIVI22ErArO4ft+KmRexiliMKMqw91W24K5o
pSGjQiMTmm9J9JKkOwfNSYRPOASoWvQDc2ciTN1Yx/Anv96JlpI1ffltXPnIyvQT
A1+oAShvbkI=
=Zj/D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Reply to: