Uploaded commonc++ 1.4.0-1 (m68k) to erlangen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 19:16:49 -0400
Source: commonc++
Binary: libcommonc++-dev libcommonc++-1.4
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.4.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account <buildd@ax.westfalen.de>
Changed-By: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
Description:
libcommonc++-1.4 - A GNU package for creating portable C++ programs
libcommonc++-dev - Header files and static libraries for Common C++
Closes: 75943 84613 87042 92369 92930
Changes:
commonc++ (1.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload (maintainer appears to be MIA)
* New upstream version (Closes: #92369)
* Use DH_COMPAT=3
* Install documentation using debhelper
* Rename shared library package to match soname (note: someone should
convince upstream that sonames are OK, and to avoid -release)
* Get rid of ridiculous substitutions on debian/changelog, debian/rules
and debian/shlibs.local by autoconf (these are used even before we try
to build the package)
* Upstream contains a badly broken debian/ dir. Our diff and rules file
attempt to fix it up into something that works
* Fix broken shlibs setup
* Build-Depends on debhelper
* Does not Build-Depend on libstdc++2.10-dev (Closes: #92930)
* Install example source code (Closes: #75943)
* Don't use kernel header asm/atomic.h, so that non-i386 arches can
work (Closes: #84613, #87042)
.
* The .so symlink has moved to the -dev package where it belongs, so the
new -dev package Replaces: the old shared lib package.
Files:
472d3adc3b9efb211702e1a27f08fc77 542896 devel optional libcommonc++-dev_1.4.0-1_m68k.deb
20185fc17e8a5bc9a1f862b247a865e9 136324 devel optional libcommonc++-1.4_1.4.0-1_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBOts3VG547I3m3eHJAQF3xAP/TDqfW8Fnrq4JI2sa/7AjFYUmtI7f+EUN
utoIOXZtX5wR10ZH+UNsOdE7fmMK0f3JfvJS4HV2pOrA1Wv61q0Rf/bVsFqYVaIS
X2MOK2bztvpSrd7Uw70KHFw1KA32UBPiUsleRL5zJOx6Ym4oFS3MBB2d35WPHLqb
uA7KyHzadFw=
=i1ry
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: