Re: thanks /megaglest
On Sat, Oct 11, 2025 at 01:50:01PM +0200, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> Thank you very much for all your NMU's fixing
> all these RC bugs about CMake 4 & GCC 15
>
> I think no one in the team would oppose
> if you did 0-day NMU instead;
> our "no-"policy as discussed in DebConf
> is quite permissive.
For me it's easier to do NMUs without having to care who the maintainer
is, a delayed upload is not more work than a direct upload and that's
better for me than keeping track of all the requests for
no/shorter/longer delay I get.
> I gave you membership to the Salsa
> group if you want to do Team upload instead.
> I guess it means a tiny more work on your
> side and tiny less work for people doing
> the next update.... later
I've pushed my changes there, but kept it a NMU.
The part where it tends to become more than "a tiny more work" are
commits already in git that I don't want to include in an NMU.
In this case it was a CI-only commit from you I just reverted (the i386
hang is the rare case of a real hang and not a too short timeout), but
often there is more.
More than 99% of my uploads in the past 9 years are for packages where
I am not a maintainer, and how to integrate NMUs in git is a minefield
where different maintainers have different opinions on what they want.
> Greetings
>
> Alexandre
cu
Adrian
Reply to: