On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 22:07:07 +0200, Miriam Ruiz <miriam@debian.org> wrote: > 2016-06-02 21:54 GMT+02:00 Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org>: > > On 02.06.2016 15:55, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > >> I'm considering asking for a removal of pixbros from the archive. It > > > I don't have any objections. I believe the low popcon value is mainly > > due to the fact that fenix is only available for 32 bit architectures > > and a lot of people are running amd64 these days. If upstream hasn't > > fixed that yet, it is probably not worth the trouble. > > Yeah, I think the same. I'm seriously considering eventually removing > fenix in the medium term as well, for that reason. Peter Pentchev's last commit to the fenix repo isn't very reassuring — http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/fenix.git/commit/?id=f3b2e3e123c51eaa7d99a7345dbc611392b11c21 (I had thought of uploading the package, to get the fix for https://bugs.debian.org/744986 into the archive, but haven't got further than Peter yet). Regards, Stephen
Attachment:
pgpxeI6lna965.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature