Miriam Ruiz <miriam@debian.org> writes: > 2015-05-02 13:56 GMT+02:00 Dmitry Smirnov <onlyjob@debian.org>: > >> Besides artists do not like censorship. Debian is like a publisher and if we >> start removing not-really-offensive artwork then artists will be very >> disappointed. I would. Those who demand to remove those images -- you would be >> very upset if publisher would drop your content that you included in your >> artwork. > > Debian's priorities are our users and free software, not upstream. It > is up to the package maintainers (in principle) to decide if patching > or not some contents out of a program serves our users better or > worse. We can choose to not touch anything and let the programs as > they are, or we may choose to patch them according to what we feel is > better. As a general rule, both options are perfectly valid depending > on the circumstances. So yeah, those who are personally involved in > packaging that game can perfectly decide to patch it, or decide not to > do it, and it won't be the end of the world. I think it is perfectly acceptable to remove content from packages, but I also think it should be noted in the description of a package that it is missing parts the upstream version includes. Will this be done here? -- Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
Attachment:
pgpTItRxR9QmT.pgp
Description: PGP signature