10/24/13 8:13 AM, David Bate пишет: > Thanks very much for the clarification, Simon. (I have read the mail > you linked and its links before, but their meaning has not really been > clear until now.) > > On Tuesday 22 October 2013 19:46:32 Simon McVittie wrote: >> of constructing the copyright file forces the packager to review >> the source files and check that everything is *actually* >> DFSG-compliant (e.g. finding non-free files that were included in a >> tarball claiming to be GPL'd). >> >> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=462996 >> >> If the source package identifies copyright holders, then >> debian/copyright needs to list all those copyright holders. It's OK >> to merge multiple copyright statements: for instance if you have >> >> src/foo.c: © 2011-2013 Homer Simpson, © 2010-2012 Ned Flanders >> src/bar.c: © 2006-2012 Homer Simpson >> >> then it's considered OK to summarize that as >> >> Files: src/*.c >> Copyright: >> © 2006-2013 Homer Simpson >> © 2010-2012 Ned Flanders > > > So, Anton. At the very least the copyright information needs to be > checked and any significant deviations from the top-level license > included (for example, we can summarise like Simon explained, but we > must check for and include files with different authors or licenses). > I certainly did not do this for my initial review, but will check any > copyright file that you construct (that includes the current one if > you have already checked it :). > > David > > Hi Devid and team, After 3th months of pause, I started working with gmqcc again. Let's finish that packaging. I had to recreate the git repo. Copyright looks good for me. Fix me if I'm wrong about that. Devid, team, pls, review the package and give yours opinions. P.S. I packaged the latest release: 3.5.0 BTW: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/gmqcc.git doesn't work now. Something was changed?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature