Re: Bug#726355: assaultcube: new upstream version of AssaultCube
It's one of the bigger shooters for linux, so it would be a shame to
orphan it. I can't maintain it as my internet is too bad to download
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Martin Werner <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:23:38PM +0200, Jérémy wrote:
>> Package: assaultcube
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Tags: upstream
>> Dear Maintainer,
>> * What led up to the situation?
>> New version 1.2 has been released the 9 october 2013
>> Can you upgrade the package, please ?
>> -- System Information:
>> Debian Release: jessie/sid
>> APT prefers testing
>> APT policy: (500, 'testing')
>> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>> Kernel: Linux 3.10-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
>> Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
>> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> I've mentioned this before, but I'll do so again:
> I've most "recently" been the one messing with AssaultCube in Debian
> (updating it from upstream 1.0.4 to the current Debian version 126.96.36.199,
> and some work beyond that). But I have since stopped actively poking at
> it. For more info see my mail at
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-games/2012/06/msg00006.html and
> a related AC license discussion in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-games/2012/10/msg00075.html + thread.
> My impression is also that Gonéri (the reviewer/sponsor of my AC
> changes) is also not actively maintaining the assaultcube package.
> So, neither I, not do I suspect Gonéri (?) will be updating the
> assaultcube package to the new upstream 1.2 anytime soon.
> However, as mentioned in previous discussions, if anyone would be
> interested in picking it up, I'd be very happy to help out with some of
> the work. But I do not intend to drive it.
> By the way, would it be relevant to orphan the assaultcube package
> currently? What do you think Gonéri, and devel-games in general?
> Martin Erik Werner <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Pkg-games-devel mailing list