Re: Merging pathological-music with pathological again
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:03:21PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> From my point of view this decision made sense in the past but nowadays
> the limiting factor seems to be manpower and not bandwith or disk space.
> We are talking about two music files which are, with xz compression, 6
> MB large in total.
One aspect you did not explicitly mention is that the binary packages
pathological and pathological-music are both arch:all. So the merger
would even reduce mirror space (due to source package deduplication).
> What do you think about this proposal?
To me this makes sense. Even if there should be frequent pathological
updates ahead, maybe compare it to chromium (3 times larger and
arch:any) or texlive (many times larger and with texlive such updates
actually happened quite a lot due to non-free removal)?
Thanks for your work.